Prince Harry Choked Up When He Remembered This Detail About Meghan’s Pregnancy

When Prince Harry attended the October 2019 WellChild Awards ceremony, perhaps no one could have predicted just how emotional the royal would get. Yes, when the Duke of Sussex stepped on stage to deliver a speech and present an award, he seemed to be struggling to hold back the waterworks. But what was the secret that almost moved the prince to tears?

Well, Harry was left choked up after reflecting on something that he had shared with his new wife, Meghan, who was also in attendance. And it’s fair to say that the pair’s romance has been a headline-grabber from the very moment that the public got wind of it. The intense interest in that relationship is unsurprising, though, considering Harry is sixth in line to the British throne. Meghan was well-known before her marriage, too, as a successful American television actress with a lead role on the long-running legal drama Suits.

And Harry and Meghan first made each other’s acquaintance in summer 2016, when the pair went on a blind date in London. During the couple’s engagement interview in 2017, Meghan told the BBC that she hadn’t known much about Harry at the time; as an American, you see, she didn’t have the level of royal knowledge of a born-and-bred Brit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fortunately, though, Harry and Meghan connected almost instantly, with the duo quickly agreeing to a second date for the day after their first meetup. And at this point, it appeared that Harry was already smitten. Indeed, when he was later asked at which point he knew Meghan was the one for him, he responded, simply, “The very first time we met.” Then, a few weeks after their second date, Meghan and Harry went to Botswana together and camped under the night sky.

The news that Harry was seeing a U.S. actress leaked to the British tabloid newspapers in October 2016, however, and the secrecy that he and Meghan had fought so hard to maintain was therefore over. Meghan later told the BBC that she had cherished the early months of the pair’s relationship, saying, “We had a good five, six months almost with just privacy, which was amazing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

What followed, though, was an unfortunate period in which Meghan received a torrent of online abuse. In fact, the vitriol was so overwhelming that Harry would release a formal press statement in which he claimed that he dealt with “nightly legal battles” to stop negative stories being published about his relationship. During his and Meghan’s engagement interview, the prince also told the BBC, “I think both of us were totally surprised by the reaction.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But the couple were undeterred by the response from certain sections of the press, with the two first appearing together in public at the Audi Polo Challenge in Ascot in May 2017. And in October of that year Meghan gave an interview to Vanity Fair magazine in which she stressed how devoted she and Harry were to each other. There, she claimed, “We’re a couple. We’re in love… Personally, I love a great love story.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And as is the case with many a great love story, it all eventually led to a lavish wedding. Harry and Meghan’s nuptials took place at Windsor Castle on May 19, 2018, in a televised event that was broadcast all around the world for millions of fans to watch. Then, less than six months later, it was announced that Meghan was pregnant with the couple’s first child.

ADVERTISEMENT

Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor was duly born on May 6, 2019 – so, slightly less than a year after his parents had wed. And the seventh in line to the British throne was unveiled to the world two days later, with his glowing mother saying during a press call, “He has the sweetest temperament. He’s really calm. He’s been the dream.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Interestingly, though, Harry and Meghan made the choice not to bestow a title upon their son – even though Archie could have received the honor of being known as the Earl of Dumbarton or as a lord. At the time, BBC royal expert Jonny Dymond described the move as “a strong indication that [the couple] don’t want to bring [Archie] up as a formal ‘royal’”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regardless of that decision, however, Harry’s brother, Prince William, was seemingly happy about the arrival of his nephew. The Duke of Cambridge even cracked a joke when he was asked about the birth, quipping that he was giving his brother a warm welcome to “the sleep deprivation society that is parenting.” William also said that he was excited about seeing Harry and Meghan “when things have quietened down.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, Harry was seemingly overwhelmed with love and admiration for his wife when he spoke to the media about the birth. “How any woman does what they do is beyond comprehension, but we’re both absolutely thrilled and so grateful to all the love and support from everybody out there,” he enthused. “It’s been amazing, so we just wanted to share this with everybody.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Harry elaborated on the birth itself by saying, “It was amazing, absolutely incredible. And, as I said, I’m so incredibly proud of my wife.” He then spoke of his own feelings on Archie, revealing, “As every father and parent will ever say, you know, your baby is absolutely amazing. But this little thing is absolutely to die for, so I’m just over the moon.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Then, during the first few months of Archie’s life, Harry and Meghan seemingly chose to keep their son out of the public eye as much as possible – perhaps in an attempt to give him as normal a childhood as they could. Given the pair’s high profile and the demand to know more about the new arrival, though, this choice was not always well-received.

ADVERTISEMENT

Indeed, there was somewhat of a public outcry over Harry and Meghan’s decision to keep Archie’s July 2019 christening a behind-closed-doors event. Yes, the couple not only refused to allow any media at the ceremony, but they also only released pictures of the service that they had pre-approved. The royals even refused to name who they had chosen as their son’s godparents.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, when British newspaper the Daily Express conducted an online survey, it found that 82 percent of voters disagreed with the ceremony being a private affair. Majesty magazine’s Ingrid Seward also voiced her displeasure at the move, suggesting that Meghan and Harry had “misinterpreted the whole situation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Nevertheless, it’s been claimed that Harry and Meghan believe Archie should be entitled to a life of relative normality. You see, as seventh in line to the crown, he is extremely unlikely to be required to function as a full-time royal public figure in the same manner as his parents, aunt, uncle and grandparents.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet Harry and Meghan haven’t completely moved away from the spotlight, of course. In October 2019, for example, the pair attended the 2019 WellChild Awards ceremony. It was Meghan’s second time at the event, as the couple had attended together in 2018; Harry has also been a patron of the charity since 2007.

ADVERTISEMENT

And when he took to the stage to deliver his speech, the Duke of Sussex struggled to contain his emotions. He began by speaking about how inspirational the award-winners were, adding that hearing about children who suffer from serious illness “pulls at [his] heartstrings” even more since becoming a parent himself.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It has been over a decade since I first came to these awards, and every year they never fail to surprise and inspire me,” Harry said. “Yet this year, it resonates in a different way, because now I’m a father.” He went on to speak about the powerful feelings that he and Meghan had experienced the previous year at the ceremony.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Last year, when my wife and I attended, we knew we were expecting our first child,” Harry admitted. Then, when revealing that the two had kept their incredible news a secret, the prince broke down in the middle of his next sentence. “No one else [knew] at the time, but we did – and I remember…” he said before stopping.

ADVERTISEMENT

At this point, Harry managed an awkward laugh as he tried to work through the surge of emotion that he was seemingly feeling, with the event’s host, TV presenter Gaby Roslin, subsequently stepping forward to comfort him. “Sorry,” he said, before regaining his composure and continuing.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I remember squeezing Meghan’s hand so tight during the awards – both of us thinking what it would be like to be parents one day,” Harry added. “And more so, what it would be like to do everything we could to protect and help our child – should they be born with immediate challenges or become unwell over time.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Then Harry went on to reassert how his perspective on childhood illness had changed since he had become a father to Archie. He candidly admitted, “And now, as parents, being here and speaking to all of you pulls at my heartstrings in a way I could have never understood until I had a child of my own.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Indeed, Archie – who was only five months old at the time of the awards ceremony – has apparently had a profound effect on his father’s outlook on life and parenting. Harry went on to verbalize the very real fear that any parent has of their child being born with disabilities or other difficulties.

ADVERTISEMENT

“No parent wants to hear that their child will suffer [and] that they will face extraordinary challenges that will affect them throughout their lives,” Harry added, articulating something that may have resonated deeply with the families in attendance. In fact, many parents in the audience would once have been given this exact kind of devastating news.

ADVERTISEMENT

Harry then praised the families for their attitudes to the challenges that they face on a daily basis. He added, “And yet, after meeting all of the WellChild parents and the kids themselves over the years, you’ve managed to give all of us a sense of optimism – a sense of hope and strength that no professional, no bestselling book and no amount of advice can ever give any of us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It appeared, too, that Harry held genuine admiration for the charity with which he has spent over a decade working, of the children with whom he spends time interacting and of the families with whom he converses. The royal continued to those in attendance, “So, thank you for being you.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And Harry moved into the final portion of his speech by saying, “All the young people, their families, the nurses [and] the support staff here tonight have demonstrated extraordinary strength, courage and resilience. Never ever underestimate what this means for each other within your community or further afield. You are all role models – and pretty fantastic ones at that!”

ADVERTISEMENT

What’s more, the public reaction to Harry’s speech was overwhelmingly positive, with social media, columnists and websites all commending him for being open and honest with his emotions. But not everyone was so generous about the royal. Journalist and TV personality Janet Street-Porter decided to criticize Harry, for example, when she spoke on British daytime TV show Loose Women following the event.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, Street-Porter opened a can of worms when she said that she wished Harry had “reined it in a little bit.” And she clarified her opinion by adding, “I just don’t want all the men all over Britain to think they have to live up to that standard and start sobbing at every opportunity.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Furthermore, Street-Porter believed that it wasn’t acceptable for a member of the royal family to break down like that in public. During her time on the show, she even implied that he had been influenced in some way by his new wife, adding, “[Harry] thinks it’s acceptable – that’s his generation. And [Meghan has] had a big impact on him.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Perhaps, though, Street-Porter’s issue was more with the royal family and the way they handle their interactions with the British public as opposed to anything to do with Harry’s emotion in particular. She explained, “I can allow that as a new dad, [Harry]’s excited and everything else. But the royals kind of want it both ways.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In particular, Street-Porter seemed to take umbrage with Harry and Meghan’s handling of baby Archie’s limited public engagements. She went on, “There are times when they want their privacy: times when they won’t want to tell us who [Archie’s godparents are] or where the baby was born. And then they want to overshare, and I’m a little bit confused.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Then the topic of the National Health Service advertising campaign Every Mind Matters – in which Harry are Meghan are involved – was raised. And Street-Porter invited the ire of her co-hosts Coleen Nolan and Ruth Langsford when she questioned why the Windsors were becoming involved in discussions on mental health.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I didn’t think it was the job of the royal family to get in touch with our feelings,” the journalist complained, adding that she didn’t understand why “the royals have made it their mission” to normalize discussions about mental health. On that point, though, Street-Porter was immediately challenged on her opinion by Nolan. Viewers also took to social media to denounce this rather old-fashioned British “stiff upper lip” attitude.

ADVERTISEMENT

The world may soon be in for some more public displays of emotion from Harry, though, if a royal rumor is to be believed. You see, many observers believe that Meghan is pregnant again – thanks in part to a few clues that have been subsequently seized upon by social media users.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of these hints seemingly came on November 9, 2019, when Harry and Meghan attended the London Festival Of Remembrance alongside other members of the royal family. And while many photographs were taken of the couple throughout the evening, one snap made as they entered the event would go on to cause a particular stir.

ADVERTISEMENT

In that shot, Meghan was pictured with her hand resting gracefully at the top of her stomach – a position commonly associated with pregnancy. Yet while this would have been enough to cause rumors to spread online, earlier in the week Harry had also made comments at another event – and these words may have raised some eyebrows.

ADVERTISEMENT

On that occasion, Harry and Meghan had been visiting military families. And during a conversation with army wife Susie Stringfellow, the prince seemed particularly preoccupied with questions about the realities of adding a second child to a family. Stringfellow subsequently told website Forces Network, “We were trying to encourage [Harry] to have a second baby.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And this brings up the questions of royal heirs. For more than 65 years, you see, Queen Elizabeth II has been the monarch of the U.K. Yet although she’s not going anywhere for the time being, she will one day be absent from the throne. When that finally happens, her son Charles will take over. That will also leave Prince William and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, in a new position.

ADVERTISEMENT

Interestingly, the Queen actually welcomed Prince Charles into the world inside Buckingham Palace. This was on November 14, 1948, when Charles became the first child of the then-Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh. Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip – who had married one year before giving birth to Charles – are also parents to Prince Andrew, Prince Edward and Anne, Princess Royal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Charles received a private education, before beginning to attend Cambridge’s Trinity College in 1967. His time at that university actually made him the first heir to the throne to obtain a bachelor’s degree. And on top of that, the prince also went to the Royal Air Force College and the Royal Naval College.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, between 1971 and 1976 Charles completed a tour of duty as part of the Royal Navy. The royal has since been heavily involved in charity work, and in 1976 he founded The Prince’s Trust. This organization helps children and adults who are having a difficult time at school or who are unemployed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Arguably, however, Charles is known more for his private life than his charitable work. Yet what some people might not realize is that Charles actually dated Camilla Parker Bowles before he started a relationship with a certain Lady Diana. According to two royal biographies, the royal family allegedly deemed Camilla as an unsuitable bride.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ultimately, Charles and Camilla broke it off, and the prince tied the knot with Diana at St. Paul’s Cathedral on July 29, 1981. Then, less than one year later, Diana gave birth to her first child with Charles. Yes, on June 21, 1982, Prince William entered the world. And two years after that, on September 15, 1984, the couple welcomed another son, Prince Harry.

ADVERTISEMENT

What’s more, as William and Harry grew and developed, Diana worked hard to ensure that her children had a normal life – and an awareness of their privileges. She dropped them off at school whenever she could, for example, and even took them to theme parks. By contrast, the princess also made sure that her boys went with her to a number of royal engagements – including one to a homeless shelter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before long, however, cracks seemingly began to appear in Diana’s marriage to Charles. In 1992, in fact, the pair separated – and they divorced four years later. And in the meantime, the prince allegedly admitted that when his marriage had become irreparable, he’d had an affair with his former partner Camilla.

ADVERTISEMENT

Diana allegedly had affairs, too, with one of the most speculated upon having apparently been with British Army officer James Hewitt. And to this day, rumors remain that Hewitt – rather than Charles – is the real father of Harry. That said, all parties involved have asserted that this is not the case, as Harry was already in the world when Diana started seeing Hewitt.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 1997, however, the entire episode ended in tragedy. That’s because on August 31 of that year, Diana died in a car accident in Paris. She was just 36 years old at the time of her death. Charles later traveled to France to transport her body back to the U.K.

ADVERTISEMENT

And the prince had to weather his own storm as the nation prepared for Diana’s funeral. In reaction to the loss, there had been a public outpouring of grief unlike any previously seen in modern-day Britain – with Charles bearing the brunt of some of the subsequent backlash. Had he not divorced Diana, it was suggested, she might not have been in Paris in the first place.

ADVERTISEMENT

Charles was not subsequently seen with another woman for a further two years following Diana’s death. Then, in 1999 Charles and Camilla appeared together for a birthday bash at London’s Ritz hotel. The couple had seemingly reignited their relationship, and in February 2005 they confirmed their engagement. They then married in a civil ceremony that April, and Camilla was later given the title of the Duchess of Cornwall.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet it should be noted that Charles is more than just his love life. Throughout his adult life, after all, Charles has carried out duties on behalf of the royal family and the Commonwealth. He has also developed charities that focus on the environment, youth and education. And as well as being a dedicated environmentalist, Charles is additionally interested in architecture.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fascinatingly, Charles wouldn’t be first in line to the throne now if a shocking decision hadn’t occurred many decades ago. This concerned Edward VIII, who was made the monarch in 1936 after the death of his father, King George V. It turned out, you see, that he was in love with an American divorcee named Wallis Simpson.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet the Church of England and the U.K. government didn’t approve of the union between the king and his proposed bride. After all, a divorcée was simply not a suitable wife. So, in an incredible move, Edward decided to vacate the throne. In fact, he announced that he would be abdicating after less than 12 months as sovereign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Edward declared at the time, “I have found it impossible to carry on the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge the duties of king, as I would wish to do, without the help and support of the woman I love.” The decision meant that his younger brother took the throne in his place. So the Duke of York therefore became King George VI, and Edward went on to marry Simpson the next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

And the specter of Edward VIII still hangs over the royal family. To this day, in fact, they arguably approach the concept of divorce far more cautiously than perhaps the average person would. When the already divorced Charles married the already divorced Camilla in 2005, for example, the Queen did not attend the religious part of the ceremony.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is, of course, the possibility that the Queen had actually wanted to be there, given that her oldest child was getting remarried. But rumor had it that she didn’t want to be seen putting her son over the Church of England’s beliefs. And while the Church no longer strictly forbids divorce or remarriage after divorce – as it once used to – it does strongly counsel against such things.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to The Daily Telegraph in 2005, an anonymous “friend of the Queen” claimed that the monarch herself had said, “I am not able to go. I do not feel that my position permits it.” This unknown person then went on, “The Queen feels she has to put her role with the Church before her role as a mother.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The same issue came up when Harry prepared to tie the knot with Meghan Markle in 2018. Meghan was also a divorcée, having once been married to a film producer named Trevor Engelson prior to their split in 2013. And before Meghan’s wedding to Harry, questions arose regarding whether or not the Queen would attend the ceremony.

ADVERTISEMENT

Royal butler Grant Harrold told the Daily Express at the time, “Prince Charles’ wedding was 13 years ago, [and] times have changed. It could be a change of heart… You have the unfortunate Edward and Wallace Simpson episode, and 70 years later nobody blinks an eyelid.” Indeed, it’s now been more than 80 years since King George VI took the throne, and the royals – not to mention the world at large – have changed since then.

ADVERTISEMENT

In case you don’t know, King George VI was actually Queen Elizabeth II’s father. When George acceded to the throne, the future queen was ten years old, while her younger sister, Margaret, was aged six. Elizabeth then became the heir apparent. She was just 25 years old when she was made the monarch following the death of her father in 1952.

ADVERTISEMENT

This development seemingly came as a surprise to the young Queen. Although her father’s health had been declining for a while, it appears clear that Elizabeth had not been expecting him to die. At the time of his passing, after all, she was in Kenya with her husband, Prince Philip. The couple had actually spent the night at the Treetops Hotel in Aberdare National Park.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Time, Elizabeth had been “in high spirits over her ‘tremendous experience’ and vowed to come again soon with her father.” She had apparently also stated that her dad would “love it” there. A BBC reporter further claimed that, just that morning, Elizabeth had been “talking about her father and proudly describing how bravely he’d stood up to his illness.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In any case, though, Elizabeth became Queen – and a young Charles took her place as the heir to the throne. He was just three years of age at that time. And while Elizabeth has since become the longest-reigning monarch in British history, Charles, in turn, has become the longest-serving heir.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, when Charles turned 70 in November 2018, it was noted that he is also the oldest heir apparent. And when he becomes king, he will also be the oldest monarch to be crowned in the history of the British royal family. This distinction was previously held by William IV, who was nearly 65 years old when he assumed the role in 1830.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s for this reason that it’s been suggested that Charles could choose to abdicate the throne in favor of his son William. And this, it seems, could be a popular decision – at least as far as some of the British public is concerned. In fact, a StatistaCharts survey for The Week found that almost 50 percent of Britons would prefer to see William become king in Charles’ place.

ADVERTISEMENT

Furthermore, Diana reportedly had mixed feelings about Charles becoming monarch. This perhaps shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, considering their divorce was far from amicable. And in 1995 the princess spoke out about the subject on the BBC show Panorama, after journalist Martin Bashir asked her, “Do you think the Prince of Wales will ever be king?”

ADVERTISEMENT

Diana replied, “I don’t think any of us know the answer to that.” But she went on, “There was always conflict on that subject with [Charles] when we discussed it, and I understood that conflict. Because it’s a very demanding role, being Prince of Wales, but it’s an equally more demanding role being king.”

ADVERTISEMENT

More tellingly, Diana added, “Being Prince of Wales produces more freedom now, and being king would be a little bit more suffocating. And because I know the character, I would think that the top job, as I call it, would bring enormous limitations to him – and I don’t know whether he could adapt to that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It nevertheless looks as though Charles has every intention of taking over the throne from his mother. And the Queen also appears to be preparing Charles to become monarch by handing over some of her responsibilities to him. In recent years, for instance, he has placed a wreath for Remembrance Day in her place.

ADVERTISEMENT

But what will actually happen when the Queen inevitably passes away? Well, when Elizabeth dies, it seems that a series of plans will be put into effect. This operation is reportedly known as Operation London Bridge. According to this supposed plan, the news of the Queen’s passing will be spread amongst civil servants with the phrase, “London Bridge is down.”

ADVERTISEMENT

According to a 2017 report by The Guardian, the BBC – as the British public service broadcaster – will also be informed of the breaking news via a system called RATS, or the Radio Alert Transmission System. Among some people, apparently, RATS also unofficially stands for “royal about to snuff it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

After that, Sir Christopher Geidt, the Queen’s private secretary, will apparently notify the prime minister of her death before the public is told. The PM must then apparently tell the 36 nations of the Commonwealth and the 15 countries over which the monarch rules. And when the news is made public, pilots will apparently announce it on flights, and flags will be put to half-mast.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s also expected that people working in the U.K. will get the rest of the day off. Banks and stock exchanges will likely be closed when the Queen is buried too. There could be other marks of respect as well. For instance, after the death of George VI, the BBC ceased showing comedy of any kind on television until his funeral had passed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before the funeral, though, the Queen’s body will likely be at Westminster Hall for four days to allow the public to mourn her. Then, she’ll probably be buried at St. George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle, where her parents were both laid to rest. The days of the funeral and the next coronation will reportedly be made into public holidays too.

ADVERTISEMENT

Charles will also immediately become king and will probably make a statement on the day of his mother’s death. He could then decide upon any of his given names – which include Arthur, Philip and George – to be used when he is ruler. Otherwise, he will be known as King Charles III, and his wife will potentially be Queen Camilla.

ADVERTISEMENT

Camilla’s title has long been a matter of some debate, however. In 2017 Charles’ biographer Sally Bedell Smith spoke to People about the process of coming up with a suitable honor for Camilla, saying, “It was obviously fudged when [Charles and Camilla] got married. Diana was so uppermost in many people’s minds. So, they concocted the notion of a Princess Consort, which is made up.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But Bedell Smith went on, “[The royal family] obviously have worked very hard to have [Camilla] accepted, and she has been accepted. If she were anything less than Queen Consort [when Charles is king], it would imply inferiority on her part… Most of the constitutional experts agree that by common law and tradition, [Camilla] is entitled to be queen.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But what will all this mean for William? Well, when George VI died and Elizabeth became Queen, Charles was made the Duke of Cornwall. He has, however, accumulated several other titles throughout his life. These include Duke of Rothesay, Lord of the Isles, Earl of Carrick, Baron of Renfrew, Duke of Cornwall, Earl of Chester and Great Stewart of Scotland.

ADVERTISEMENT

And while Charles received most of his titles when his mother was crowned Queen of the United Kingdom, this is not the case for all of them. The Prince of Wales is, for instance, a title that has been in effect since 1301. However, it’s not automatically given to heirs.

ADVERTISEMENT

The title is, as a matter of fact, reserved for male heirs to the throne. And there was no Prince of Wales when George VI was king, as he had only had daughters. So some six years after Elizabeth became Queen, she actually appointed Charles as the Prince of Wales.

ADVERTISEMENT

As part of his position as the Duke of Cornwall, Charles receives a salary from the Duchy of Cornwall. This territory was created by Edward III in the 14th century and consists of 131,000 acres of land and properties. And on top of everything else, it additionally includes an investment portfolio.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Duke of Cornwall – in this case, Charles – receives the money from the duchy in order to finance his various public and private enterprises. Such endeavors can actually include his charity initiatives. Furthermore, the fund can also help out his close family members, such as his children and his grandchildren.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is also a Duchy of Lancaster that is made up of land and properties, but this belongs to the Queen. She additionally receives funds from the British government’s Sovereign Grant. Unsurprisingly, then, there will be some major changes for the royal family and their titles when the monarch dies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Interestingly, there have actually been a number of changes to some royals’ titles in recent times. For instance, Charles’ sons were initially known by the names of Prince William of Wales and Prince Henry of Wales. Now, though, the pair’s titles have altered as a result of their respective marriages.

ADVERTISEMENT

When they married in 2011, for example, William and his wife Kate became the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Their children are therefore known as Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis of Cambridge. And after Harry’s wedding in May 2018, he and wife Meghan were made the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course, Harry and Meghan have a child now – a boy named Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor. Yet even prior to Archie’s birth, it was known that he wouldn’t necessarily have the title of “Prince.” And that’s all because of a decree that King George V – the Queen’s grandfather – made back in 1917.

ADVERTISEMENT

Specifically, the king proclaimed, “The grandchildren of the sons of any such Sovereign in the direct male line (save only the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) shall have and enjoy in all occasions the style and title enjoyed by the children of Dukes of these Our Realms.” Basically, unless you’re a male somewhere in the direct line to the throne, you’re not a prince.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet the “male” part of that ruling is something that’s changed over the years. Before Kate and William had their first child, you see, the U.K. government adopted “absolute primogeniture” – meaning the first-born child of an heir could take the throne regardless of gender. With that, a younger boy in the line of succession would no longer take precedence over an older girl; gender equality had been placed into the equation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, Harry and Meghan ended up rejecting potential royal titles for Archie – at least while he’s still a baby. Yes, while the youngster could have been called the Earl of Dumbarton – the title his father holds in Scotland – instead he will be referred to as just “Master Archie” for the time being.

ADVERTISEMENT

That may all change, though, once the Queen passes away and everyone moves up the line of succession. Then, Charles will be king, while William will be the direct heir. And as Archie will subsequently be a grandchild of the monarch, he will be entitled to call himself “Prince” if he so desires.

ADVERTISEMENT

Will Harry receive a new title when his father becomes king? Well, probably not. Unless Charles wants to give him another dukedom – and that’s certainly not beyond the realms of possibility – Harry will likely remain as just the Duke of Sussex, with Meghan still the Duchess of Sussex.

ADVERTISEMENT

But as if all that wasn’t already confusing enough, there’s more. William, for his part, holds the titles of Earl of Strathearn and Baron Carrickfergus. Yet when Charles becomes king, William will therefore take up some new responsibilities. And as a consequence, his titles will be forced to change.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the eldest heir to the throne once Charles is king, William will inherit the Duchy of Cornwall and become the Duke of Cornwall. The duke has, in fact, already started attending duchy meetings. He and wife Kate will also be expected to be named the Prince and Princess of Wales.

ADVERTISEMENT

Royal Central editor Charlie Proctor revealed in November 2018 that plans are actually underway for this transition. “As per tradition, when Prince Charles does take to the throne, William and Kate will become the Prince and Princess of Wales, meaning he will take on additional duties to assist the monarch,” he told the Daily Star. “Just like Prince Charles is preparing to become king, William is already preparing to become Prince of Wales ready for the duties and responsibilities he will have to take on.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Proctor continued, “I think it is important to say that just like his father, William is also preparing to become king. There is no chance that William will be Prince of Wales for more than 60 years. As such, he must also learn the ropes because his time on the throne may come sooner rather than later.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And it’s clear that the Queen believes her son is more than capable of taking on the duties that come with being King of the United Kingdom. At a party she hosted for his 70th birthday, Elizabeth II gave a moving toast to Charles. “Over his 70 years, Philip and I have seen Charles become a champion of conservation and the arts, a great charitable leader – a dedicated and respected heir to the throne to stand comparison with any in history – and a wonderful father,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then, the Queen actually mentioned Charles’ second spouse. She added, “Most of all, sustained by his wife, Camilla, he is his own man, passionate and creative. So this toast is to wish a happy birthday to my son, in every respect a duchy original. To you Charles. To the Prince of Wales.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But bearing in mind that Charles is over 70 years old already, it’s only practical to assume that his reign will be a short one. And while William prepares to take over from his father, he’ll also likely be grooming his young son George to sit on the throne one day. So, while George reportedly doesn’t know yet that he’s in line to be king, he’s bound to find out before long.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

However, there are some who don’t believe that Charles will ever become king – regardless of whether his mother abdicates or not. In 2018 former royal butler Paul Burrell told Now to Love, for example, that “we will never see King Charles and Queen Camilla sat on the throne of England.”

Why, exactly? Burrell went on, “Because when the Queen dies, she’ll be 100-and-something; she will never abdicate. When she dies, I think Charles will do the right thing and say, ‘I’m far too old for this responsibility.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

And yet there’s also a curious secondary issue at play: the notion that some of the royals don’t actually want to be kings or queens, at least not until they’ve lived their lives first. In the book Charles, Prince of Wales, for example, author Gill Knappett claimed that William doesn’t want to “climb the ladder of kingship” until he’s older.

ADVERTISEMENT

Furthermore, Harry himself has come right out and said that the role of monarch is not a coveted one among his relatives. “We are involved in modernizing the British monarchy. We are not doing this for ourselves but for the greater good of the people,” he told Newsweek in 2017. “Is there any one of the royal family who wants to be king or queen? I don’t think so, but we will carry out our duties at the right time.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And perhaps because the Queen sees her role as a duty – rather than a privilege – she’ll never renounce the throne. She suggested as much, too, in her 21st birthday speech back in 1947. “I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service,” were Elizabeth’s precise words.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT